views : 541
3 Min Read
As the Indian Premier League (IPL) nears its climax, cricket enthusiasts worldwide are eagerly discussing potential selections for the upcoming T20 World Cup 2024. Amidst the excitement, former Indian cricketer turned commentator, Irfan Pathan, has shed light on a crucial factor that selectors must consider: the peril of recency bias. During a recent conversation, Pathan underscored the necessity for selectors to maintain an equilibrium when finalizing the World Cup squad. He highlighted the tendency to overly prioritize IPL performances, warning against hastily including players solely based on their recent exploits in the tournament.
Pathan's insights are rooted in his own experiences and observations within the cricketing realm. He pointed out the case of Wriddhiman Saha, who, despite a prolonged absence due to injury, earned a recall to the Indian squad owing to his past contributions. Pathan emphasized the significance of evaluating a player's overall track record, both in international cricket and preceding the IPL frenzy.
In a cricketing landscape often swayed by the allure of the latest performances, Pathan's perspective serves as a timely reminder for selectors to delve deeper into a player's history and not succumb to the allure of the present moment.
"Let's talk about the 2010s. Wriddhiman Saha was literally out of the team for a year due to injury. When he recovered, he returned to the squad and made it into the Playing XI after a year. A year is indeed a long period of time. The Indian team considered what he had contributed in the past before his injury. They didn't want to undervalue that; rather, they wanted to acknowledge it. So, they decided to give him some matches and see how he performs," said former Indian cricketer Irfan Pathan in a recent interview.
"When you're in a selection committee, you shouldn't forget a player's previous contributions for India, even before the IPL. You should never forget that, and I'm not referring to events from too far back. This should always be taken into consideration," he added.
Irfan Pathan, known for his forthright manner, underscored that excelling in the IPL doesn't equate to assured selection. He highlighted the disparity between the IPL's dynamics and the rigors of international cricket. In the latter arena, formidable bowlers such as Mitchell Starc present unique challenges. Pathan's emphasis on this distinction serves as a reminder that success in one format doesn't necessarily translate to another. The IPL's frenetic pace and batting-friendly pitches contrast sharply with the diverse conditions and competitive standards of international matches.
In this context, Pathan's candid assessment underscores the importance of adaptability and consistency across varied cricketing environments. His insights shed light on the nuanced factors considered in player selection, beyond just statistical performances in domestic leagues. Ultimately, his remarks offer valuable perspective for aspiring cricketers navigating the transition from domestic to international cricket.
"Just because some players are performing well in the IPL, it doesn't mean they should automatically be selected. In the IPL, there are always one or two uncapped bowlers who can be easily smacked due to small grounds and flat pitches. However, international cricket is a different beast altogether.
"You'll have five bowlers, each with a significant number of matches under their belt before entering the World Cup, bringing in tons of experience. You'll be up against top-quality bowlers like Mitchell Starc. While Starc's performance in the IPL may differ, you'll still be facing top-quality bowlers. For instance, from Sri Lanka, you might face someone like Pathirana. But you'll also have the other four bowlers, who are top-quality performers," Pathan added.